Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Need Commercial Insurance

No business should operate without insurance, especially a business in which the owners have invested a lot of money.  Bad things happen in business no matter how careful people are.  All businesses need appropriate insurance first to pay the legal cost to defend a lawsuit and second to pay the amount of a judgment or settlement.

All Arizona medical marijuana dispensaries need appropriate commercial insurance for all of their activities.  I feared that perhaps the industry might not be able to buy insurance because the business involves the possession and sale of marijuana, a substance that is illegal to possess and sell under federal law.

Fortunately my fear is unfounded.  My long-time good friend Dan Ellington, a commercial insurance agent with BBVA Compass Insurance in Phoenix, tells me that he and his firm are able to advise prospective Arizona medical marijuana dispensaries and dispensaries with licenses on the types of commercial insurance needed and the coverage amounts and purchase the desired insurance for the dispensaries.

Hee are a few of Dan Ellington’s comments to me about insuring an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary:

  • Insurance coverage can be obtained for professional liability associated with dispensing.
  • Insurance coverage can be obtained for general liability associated with the dispensing location.
  • Coverage cannot exceed what is allowed under Arizona law.
  • Products / completed operations can be insured only if the marijuana sold by the dispensary is grown by the dispensary.
  • Products-stand alone coverage may be offered under products line of business.
  • If the dispensary or cultivation site has armed security, the insurer considers the insured to have a very high hazard situation.
  • Coverage will be denied if the insured does not comply with all applicable laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances and other federal, state and local restrictions governing the dispensing of medical marijuana.
  • Minimum policy premium $2,750
  • Maximum limits:  $1 million per claim; $3 million aggregate.
  • Minimum deductible:  $2,500.

For more information about insuring your dispensary or to purchase insurance for your dispensary, call Dan Ellington at 602-956-7800.  BBVA Compass Insurance is located at 2002 East Osborn Road, Phoenix, AZ 85016.

By |2011-01-29T14:32:18-07:00January 27th, 2011|Dispensary Insurance, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Need Commercial Insurance

Arizona’s Three Universities Will Ban Medical Marijuana on Campus

East Valley Tribune:  “federal law prohibits possession and use of marijuana, even for medical purposes. And the penalty for schools that don’t enforce that . . . is loss of any federal aid, including student participation in the guaranteed student loan program.

By |2011-02-16T18:35:44-07:00January 26th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona’s Three Universities Will Ban Medical Marijuana on Campus

Arizona’s Medical Marijuana Law

Phoenix Magazine:  “A dazed new world?  Could the new medical marijuana act and its ‘cannabusinesses’ create a sixth ‘c’ for Arizona, or will it devolve into California’s reefer madness?”

By |2015-04-06T18:49:25-07:00January 24th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona’s Medical Marijuana Law

Pot Meets Pop: Entrepreneur Plans to Market Line of Smartly Branded Medical-marijuana Soft Drinks

Santa Cruz Sentinel:  “How strange is the emerging world of medical-marijuana entrepreneurship?  Consider Clay Butler, who may soon be marketing a food product that he’s never tasted, and that he would never buy. The product is called Canna Cola, and it’s a soft drink that contains THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, aimed at medical marijuana dispensaries.”

By |2019-06-14T08:24:51-07:00January 24th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Pot Meets Pop: Entrepreneur Plans to Market Line of Smartly Branded Medical-marijuana Soft Drinks

Alan Sobol Questions Propriety of Phoenix Planning & Zoning

On January 23, 2011, I received an email from Alan Sobol and the Consiglieri Group that raises some interesting questions about alleged conduct by the City of Phoenix with respect to “pre-registration of dispensary” locations.  The following is the text of Alan’s message:

“Nepotism at Phoenix City Hall?

January 17 2011, without any notice, twelve people lined up at Phoenix City Hall to reserve their Dispensary Locations. Without any public notice the City of Phoenix rolled out their “Pre-Registration Program”,. According to the City officials, the program was intended to allow individuals to reserve a site for medical marijuana dispensary, cultivation or infusion facilities within the City of Phoenix. The problem, zoning officials had no authority to offer such pre-registration services. The Phoenix City Council adopted Ordinance G5573( the Marijuana zoning ordinance) on December 15, 2010. Nowhere contained therein was there a provision for such pre-registration services. The city violated its own public information rules.

Perhaps the more important question is who are these twelve people that showed up to register their marijuana facility locations, and how did they find out about this program? Hmmm!

But don’t worry, we are conducting an extensive investigation into this matter and will take appropriate action should we find evidence of wrongdoing.

We urge those of you who are considering locating your facility in Phoenix to immediately visit the Phoenix website and download this pre-registration form. (Phoenix.gov/planning). We would also suggest that you keep apprised of any such pre-registration services that might pop-up in other cities or towns. We will shortly be posting a link on our website to all Arizona City and Town websites. As always if you have any questions feel free to contact us.”

By |2015-04-06T18:49:22-07:00January 24th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Alan Sobol Questions Propriety of Phoenix Planning & Zoning

Alan Sobol & Andrew Meyer Speak at the Same NORML Event

I got an email message from The Consiglieri Group on January 16, 2011, that contained the following from Alan Sobol about his close encounter of the third kind with Andrew Meyer at a NORML meeting in Tucson where both men had been invited to speak.  I’m sure Alan was hoping to start the debate with Andrew that Alan asked for recently, but alas, it didn’t happen.  Here’s what Alan wrote:

As you may recall I challenged MPP Manager , Andrew Meyer to a debate last week.  So far no response.

However, I did have the opportunity to bump into Mr. Meyers last Saturday at the Tucson Norml meeting.  Meyer’s did not know that I was asked to speak.  According to the Norml president Jon,   in order to give balance to the meeting both Meyers and me were invited to speak.  Mr. Meyer was obviously shaken to  learn of the dual speaking event. During Meyer’s presentation he admitted that he was working with the Health Department  through “third party agencies” to develop the rules. He repeately  referred to the  rule making progress as, “WE ARE” working on the rules”.  But the most shocking revelation was Meyer’s admission that he now believed that my original idea of a “two step” application process was the appropriate way to administer the approval process.

Immediately after his presentation Meyer rudely and hurrily  exited the building apparently  so as not to be confronted with any attendee questions regarding my presentation.
Meyer and I had no direct communication except  for the finger I received from his lady friend Ms. Tea  as they ran from the building.

I believe that on January 31, 2011 when the AZDHS releases their revised  proposed rules  we will see a more reasonable application process. I further believe that as a direct result of the thousands of comments received from all of you, the AZDHS will be forced to moderate their rules.  want to encourage all of you to continue with your business plans, whatever they may be. Don’t loose the opportunity to become involved in this new industry, simply because you do not have enough time to get it finished.  Keep moving forward prudently.

Thanks for all your support, and keep fighting,

Allan Sobol
Marijuana Marketing strategies, LLC

By |2011-01-19T20:52:39-07:00January 19th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Alan Sobol & Andrew Meyer Speak at the Same NORML Event

Medical Marijuana Backers Air Views at Tempe Council Session

Arizona Republic:  “”A crowd of medical marijuana supporters attended a Tempe City Council meeting to demand that council members respect the ‘will of the voters’ who passed Proposition 203 in November. . . . Many of the medical marijuana advocates took issue with the proposed Tempe ordinance requiring dispensaries be located only in industrial areas and operate only in the daytime.”

By |2012-08-18T10:16:53-07:00January 18th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana Backers Air Views at Tempe Council Session

Gilbert Sets Rules for Medical Marijuana Locations, Hours

Arizona Republic:  “As area entrepreneurs prepare to capitalize on a voter-approved initiative legalizing medical marijuana, the Gilbert Town Council approved regulations on where, when and how the pot-based businesses can operate.  Dispensaries and cultivation sites will only be allowed within industrial zoning districts in northwest Gilbert near Morrison Ranch and near Gilbert Road and the Santan Freeway.”

By |2012-08-18T09:34:53-07:00January 15th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Gilbert Sets Rules for Medical Marijuana Locations, Hours

Glendale Unveils Medical-marijuana Proposals

Arizona Republic:  “Residents armed with questions attended a community meeting Thursday to hear Glendale’s proposed zoning restrictions on marijuana-related facilities.  City planners propose to allow dispensaries in general-office, general-commercial and heavy-commercial zones and the cultivation in light- and heavy-industrial zones.”

By |2012-08-18T09:37:41-07:00January 11th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Glendale Unveils Medical-marijuana Proposals

Alan Sobol Challenges Andrew Meyer to a Verbal Duel

I got an email message from The Consiglieri Group on January 10, 2011, in which Alan Sobol is asking Andrew Meyers of the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association to debate him.  Here’s the text of the challenge:

“The Challenge: Allan Sobol Vs. MPP Local Manager Andrew Meyer.   OPEN CHALLENGE TO ANDREW MEYER.  2 hour Debate/discussion on the contested issues concerning the implementation of the new Arizona Medical Marijuana Act.   Paid conference hall meeting with all proceeds going to AZDHS to offset the cost of applications for low income qualifying patients.  Lets See if Mr, Meyers will respond.”

I’d like to attend, but I’m guessing Mr. Meyer will not accept the challenge.

By |2011-01-15T09:15:00-07:00January 10th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Alan Sobol Challenges Andrew Meyer to a Verbal Duel

Arizona Medical Marijuana Association is Alive!

Today the yet to be formed Arizona Medical Marijuana Association (AzMMA) had its attorney send a 17 page letter to the Arizona Department of Health Services with its suggested changes to the December 17, 2010, proposed rules.  For the most part, I think its suggested are good and should be adopted by DHS.  The only change I disagree with is AzMMA’s suggestion to increase the Arizona residency requirement to three years.  Proposition 203 does not contain a requirement that owners of medical marijuana dispensaries be residents of Arizona.  Query:  Could that requirement be an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution?

By |2011-01-18T19:13:56-07:00January 7th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Medical Marijuana Association is Alive!

Medical Marijuana Bill Fails In Illinois State House

CBS Channel 2 Chicago:  “A push to legalize medicinal marijuana failed in the state House [of Illinois] on Thursday.  As WBBM Newsradio 780’s Brian Seay reports, the bill fell four votes short of the 60 it required for passage. The final vote was 60-56.”

By |2011-01-07T07:08:53-07:00January 7th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana Bill Fails In Illinois State House

Mesa Tightening Medical Marijuana Rules

Arizona Republic:  “Medical marijuana shops in Mesa will be confined to industrial areas under an ordinance heading for City Council approval in early February.  The council’s third study-session discussion of the state’s new medical marijuana law resulted Thursday in a further tightening of the areas where the council prefers shops to be located.”

By |2012-08-18T09:41:57-07:00January 7th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Mesa Tightening Medical Marijuana Rules

Richard Keyt’s Suggested Changes to the DHS Rules

What follows is the text of the suggested changes to the Arizona Department of Health Services’ December 17, 2010, rules that I posted in the comment area on the DHS website today.  Tomorrow, January 7, 2011, is the last day to submit online comments.

1.  Eliminate the requirement for a medical director.  This greatly increases operational costs that will be passed on to the patients.  It’s not in Prop 203 and is unreasonable.  Is there any other retail business in Arizona that must have a medical director?  Do you know if a doctor’s malpractice insurance would cover services to the dispensary?  The doctor may not be covered by malpractice insurance because the insurance company may say that being a medical director for a marijuana dispensary involves an industry that violates federal law and/or does not involve the practice of medicine.

2.  If you retain the medical director, allow licensed pharmacists to be a medical director.

3.  Do not require dispensaries to get a certificate of occupancy.  Many cities (Mesa for example) do not provide a CO,.  It was only a few years ago the Phoenix started issuing them.

4.  Do not require Arizona residency.  It’s not in Prop 203 and is unreasonable.  I don’t believe there is any other type of business in Arizona that must be owned by an Arizona resident.

5.  Give dispensaries guidance on what criteria you will use to select licensees.

6.  Create a preliminary approval so dispensaries can determine they will be able to get a license before spending a large amount of money without any assurance they will actually get a license.  Dispensaries could then build tenant improvements, purchase equipment and hire personnel knowing that they have a good chance of getting the license.  Applicants that are rejected and that do not get preliminary approval, will be spared wasting their money.

7.  Ease up on the requirements for a patient to get a recommendation from a doctor.  As one local doctor wrote recently, doctors can see a patient once and prescribe any number of drugs that are potentially much more harmful than marijuana.

8.  Eliminate or greatly reduce the requirement that a dispensary grow at least 70% of the marijuana it sells.  This growing requirements causes dispensaries to fund and operate a retail business and a farm, both of which are time-consuming and expensive.  Let dispensaries that want to grow more than they sell do so.  It would reduce the capital required by other dispensaries.

By |2011-01-18T19:15:42-07:00January 6th, 2011|DHS Rules, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Richard Keyt’s Suggested Changes to the DHS Rules

Arizona Medical Marijuana: Public Comments to be Weighed when Redrafting Rules

Arizona Republic:  “More than 1,000 people have commented on the proposed medical-marijuana rules so far, responding most heavily to a handful of areas that include the definition of doctor-patient relationships and medical directors and limitations on where dispensaries get marijuana. . . .Department officials identified the top 10 suggestions as of Wednesday, including:”

By |2011-01-18T19:22:51-07:00January 6th, 2011|DHS Rules, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Medical Marijuana: Public Comments to be Weighed when Redrafting Rules

Glendale to Limit Sites for Medical Marijuana Facilities

Arizona Republic:  “Glendale is proposing a zoning amendment to limit registered non-profit medical marijuana dispensaries to manufacturing and industrial areas of the city.  City staff will host a meeting to gather public comments on the proposed zoning code amendment. Under Proposition 203, the only distance limit prohibits dispensaries from locating within 500 feet of schools.”

By |2012-08-18T09:36:39-07:00January 5th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Glendale to Limit Sites for Medical Marijuana Facilities

Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals Declares War on Arizona Department of Health Services, Marijuana Policy Project & the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association

The Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals (AZADP) fired a shot across the bow of the Arizona Department of Health Services today when AZADP issued a press release called “AZDHS and MPP Acting in Collusion to limit access to Dispensary Applicants, Monopolization abuses outlined in letter to Arizona Heath Department.”  The article starts:

“We believe that the AZDHS has been influenced by and is conspiring with other organizations, namely the Marijuana Policy Project, (MPP) and their recently established association, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association, (AzMMA), to create an elitist and monopolistic program where only the wealthy influential, informed sponsors of MPP will qualify for one of the 125 licenses. We believe that the following evidence will show that the AZDHS in collusion with MPP are intentionally developing program rules that are so complicated and costly so as to preclude otherwise qualified applicants merely on the basis of wealth and influence. We believe it is the intention of MPP to control the marketplace.”

If you are interested in obtaining a medical marijuana dispensary license in Arizona, this article is a must read.

FYI:  According to a search of the Arizona Corporation Commission’s website today, there is no entity in Arizona called “Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals,” but Allan Sobol reserved the name Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals, Inc., on 11/21/10.

By |2019-06-14T08:24:51-07:00January 4th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals Declares War on Arizona Department of Health Services, Marijuana Policy Project & the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association

Proposed Rules on Medical Marijuana are Illegal, “Cruel and Unreasonable,” Says Valley Doctor

Phoenix New Times:  “Proposed restrictions on Arizona’s voter-approved medical marijuana law are worse than illegal, says one Valley doc — they’re ‘cruel and unreasonable.’  Edgar Suter, a Mesa doctor of nuclear medicine, writes in an a lengthy call-to-arms today that the state Department of Health Services’ suggested rules concerning Proposition 203 probably violate the 1998 Voter Protection Act.”

By |2011-01-05T16:46:06-07:00January 3rd, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Proposed Rules on Medical Marijuana are Illegal, “Cruel and Unreasonable,” Says Valley Doctor

Would be Referring Doctor Not happy with First Draft of Rules

Arizona Medical Marijuana:  “The Green Leaf recently asked Dr. Ed Suter, a board certified physician and medical marijuana activist, to share his thoughts on the first draft of medical marijuana regulations released on Dec. 17 by the Arizona Department of Health Services.  Here’s his reaction:”

By |2017-02-11T17:26:04-07:00January 3rd, 2011|DHS Rules, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Would be Referring Doctor Not happy with First Draft of Rules

Phoenix Seeks Balance in Governing Medical Marijuana

Arizona Republic:  Phoenix Planning and Development Services Director Debra “Stark said the city tried to strike a balance with its zoning laws that would be strict enough to protect the community and neighborhoods, but not too strict that they wouldn’t be allowed in the city at all.   Phoenix divided medical marijuana land uses into three categories

By |2012-08-18T10:01:22-07:00December 31st, 2010|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Phoenix Seeks Balance in Governing Medical Marijuana

Long Beach Pot Law Gets Legal Setback

Press Telegram:  “The future of Long Beach’s medical marijuana regulations – and potentially of medical marijuana throughout the state – is in question after an appeals court ruling Wednesday.  The 2nd District Court of Appeals ruled that a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge must reexamine his decision Nov. 2 upholding Long Beach’s new medical marijuana ordinance.  At issue is whether Long Beach’s issuance of permits for medical marijuana collectives is a violation of federal law, which considers marijuana an illegal drug.”

Whatever the outcome  of the case when it is reconsidered by the trial court, the losing party will surely appeal.  It appears that in the not too distant future a California appellate court will determine if federal law preempts California law.  If the appellate court answers the question in the affirmative, that could be the beginning of the end of California’s medical marijuana law and other states that have legalized medical marijuana can expect to have the same battle in their courts.

By |2017-10-07T09:54:50-07:00December 30th, 2010|California News, Legal Issues, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Long Beach Pot Law Gets Legal Setback

Business Proposals for Arizona’s Budding Medical Marijuana Industry

Phoenix New Times:  “Next spring means all kinds of green in Arizona. Sometime in April, medical marijuana will be available to qualified patients across the state, and as we’ve already pointed out, that means big business in the form of dispensaries, doctor recommendations, and grow houses.  But most people can’t afford to launch any of the above businesses, and many won’t qualify under the Arizona Department of Health’s super-strict proposed guidelines. Luckily, there are plenty of fringe businesses one can start. Here are eight business proposals that could get a piece of the Pot, Inc. pie:”

By |2011-05-09T07:26:33-07:00December 30th, 2010|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Business Proposals for Arizona’s Budding Medical Marijuana Industry

Restrictions High on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

Kingman Daily Miner:  “Arizona residents interested in obtaining a medical marijuana card or opening a medical marijuana dispensary will find themselves digging deep into their pockets and poring over 47 pages of strict rules.”

By |2017-02-11T17:29:35-07:00December 24th, 2010|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Restrictions High on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

Arizona Police can do Little to Prepare for New Pot Law

Arizona Republic:  “With state health officials still designing rules to regulate the cultivation, distribution and possession of medical marijuana, police departments in Arizona say there is little they can do to prepare to enforce the law until those guidelines are complete.”

By |2010-12-24T02:36:37-07:00December 24th, 2010|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Police can do Little to Prepare for New Pot Law

Sedona’s Time Line for Adopting Medical Marijuana Zoning

Here’s Sedona’s time line for adopting its medical marijuana zoning ordinance:

Planning and Zoning Commission Discussion:

Tuesday, January 4, 2011- 5:30 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers
Thursday, January 13, 2011 – 3:30 p.m. in Vultee Conference Room

Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing and possible recommendation to City Council:

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 – 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers

City Council Public Hearings and possible adoption:

Tuesday, February 8, 2011 – 4:30 p.m. in Council Chambers (tentative)
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 – 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers (tentative)

By |2012-08-18T10:06:53-07:00December 23rd, 2010|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Sedona’s Time Line for Adopting Medical Marijuana Zoning

DHS Says Dispensaries Can Be Limited Liability Companies

Good news.  The first draft of the proposed Arizona medical marijuana rules issued by the Arizona Department of Health Services on December 17, 2010, says that the entity that owns and operates a medical marijuana dispensary can be a limited liability company (the preferred entity of choice in Arizona), a corporation, sole proprietorship (a mistake), general partnership (a mistake) or a limited partnership (not a mistake, but somewhat obsolete in Arizona).

Although the nonprofit corporation is the only type of entity recognized by Arizona statutory law as a nonprofit entity, the ADHS correctly did not interpret the language of Proposition 203 as requiring that medical marijuana dispensary nonprofits be Arizona nonprofit corporations.  The biggest problem with a nonprofit corporation used for a business is that nobody actually owns an Arizona nonprofit.  See my June 6, 2010, article  called “Arizona Proposition 203 – Legalization of Medical Marijuana” on whether MMD nonprofits must be Arizona nonprofit corporations in which I stated:

“Proposition 203 creates a big problem for people who are contemplating creating an MMD?  The $64,000 question is must an Arizona MMD be created as an Arizona nonprofit corporation or can it be one of the types of entities typically formed to make a profit, but operated as a nonprofit entity?  We will not know the answer to this question until DHS gives us the answer or it approves MMDs that are not Arizona nonprofit corporations.”

If you need an Arizona attorney to form your Arizona LLC, see the links on the right column of this website and hire Arizona medical marijuana attorney Richard Keyt, aka the Arizona medical marijuana lawyer, to form your Arizona LLC.

By |2011-01-18T19:26:35-07:00December 21st, 2010|Legal Issues, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on DHS Says Dispensaries Can Be Limited Liability Companies

Arizona Medical Marijuana Proposed Rules Released

Arizona Republic:  “The state health department released its first draft late Thursday, providing a glimpse at how the program may work in Arizona.  The rules spell out who may qualify for medical marijuana, establish operating criteria for dispensaries and provide strict guidelines for doctors who may recommend marijuana.”  Read the December 17, 2010, first draft of Arizona Department of Health Services’ proposed Medical Marijuana Regulations and DHS’ Call for Public Comment and Electronic Comment Form.

By |2011-01-18T19:28:11-07:00December 18th, 2010|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Medical Marijuana Proposed Rules Released

Proposed Rules on Medical Marijuana Tougher Than Voter-Approved Law; Estimate of Potential Patients Lowered

Phoenix New Times:  “Before the release of draft rules on Proposition 203, Will Humble, the director of the state Department of Health Services, estimated 100,000 people a year might qualify for medical marijuana.  Now, under the proposed regulations, only 10,000 to 20,000 people a year would qualify, he said in a news conference today. . . . The voters approved Proposition 203, and now the state wants to smother the new law with over-bearing rules.”

By |2010-12-20T19:56:17-07:00December 17th, 2010|DHS Rules, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Proposed Rules on Medical Marijuana Tougher Than Voter-Approved Law; Estimate of Potential Patients Lowered

Kingman P&Z Seeks More Information on Dispensary Rules

Kingman Daily Miner:  “Commissioners vote to send most restrictive zoning alternative to Council.  People interested in opening a medical marijuana dispensary within the city limit may be facing some strict guidelines. The city of Kingman Planning and Zoning Commission recommended adopting the most stringent out of three possible zoning recommendations for the dispensaries Tuesday night.”

By |2017-02-11T17:25:59-07:00December 16th, 2010|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Kingman P&Z Seeks More Information on Dispensary Rules

Scottsdale Planning Commission Backs Amendment for Medical-marijuana Regulations

Arizona Republic:  “The Scottsdale Planning Commission on Wednesday backed a text amendment establishing regulations to comply with a new state law that legalizes growing, manufacturing and dispensing medical marijuana in the city. . . .The commission voted, 5-1, to recommend dispensing, manufacturing and growing be allowed without a conditional use permit in the special campus zoning district as part of a hospital or medical campus. Also, dispensing and manufacturing would be allowed in the commercial office zoning district with a conditional use permit.”

By |2012-08-18T10:10:26-07:00December 16th, 2010|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Scottsdale Planning Commission Backs Amendment for Medical-marijuana Regulations
Go to Top