Considerations on Signing a Personal Guaranty of an Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary Lease

Question:  My landlord wants the owners of my Arizona medical marijuana dispensary nonprofit entity to sign a Personal Guaranty.  What is it and should the owners sign the guaranty?

Answer:  A Personal Guaranty is a promise by the guarantor to pay the debt of a third party or to satisfy an obligation of a third party.  If an entity such as a corporation or a limited liability company signs a lease for real property, the general rule of Arizona law is that the owners of the entity are not liable for the debts or obligations of the entity, including the rent.  Landlords understand the law so a prudent landlord will require the owners of the entity to sign a Personal Guaranty by which the signer becomes legally obligated to pay to the landlord any amounts due under the lease that are not paid by the tenant and to satisfy any obligations of the tenant under the lease that are not satisfied.  The landlord usually wants all of the owners of the tenant entity to sign a Personal Guaranty.

Personal Guarantees of leases are not required by Arizona law.  Whether or not the owners give a personal guaranty is negotiable with the landlord.  In economic times that favor landlords, they almost always require the owners of the tenant entity to sign a Personal Guaranty unless the entity has a satisfactory financial statement.  During economic times that favor tenants, i.e., now, the owners of the entity may refuse to sign a Personal Guaranty and a desperate landlord may nevertheless enter into the lease without any Personal Guarantees because the landlord needs the rental income.

Personal Guaranty Negotiating Advice

Here are some negotiating tips for owners of an entity that may reduce their liability for the entity’s defaults under the lease when the landlord insists that the owners sign a Personal Guaranty:

  • Reduce the term of the Personal Guaranty.  Just because the lease is for five years does not mean the Personal Guaranty must last the same period of time.  Try to shorten the term of the Personal Guaranty to some period less than the full term of the lease.
  • Don’t guaranty extensions of the lease.  If the original term of the lease expires and the entity exercises an option to extend the term of the lease, include language in the Personal Guaranty that it does not apply with respect to any extensions of the lease.
  • Limit the maximum dollar amount of the signer’s liability.  State in the Personal Guaranty that the maximum amount for which the signer is liable is $50,000 or $100,000 or whatever is the lowest number the landlord will agree to.  If the landlord spends the landlord’s money for tenant improvements or for other items required of the landlord, the landlord will almost always want the landlord’s total out-of-pocket expenses to be the signer’s minimum liability.
  • If the landlord will agree to limit the signer’s liability to a stated amount, provide in the Personal Guaranty that the amount of the liability goes down each month.  For example, if the signer’s maximum liability is $120,000 and the term of the Personal Guaranty is two years, provide in the Personal Guaranty that the signer’s liability goes down $5,000 every month.
  • State in the Personal Guaranty that the signer’s obligations terminate as of the date the entity loses its license to operate an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary.
  • State in the Personal Guaranty that the signer’s liability terminates if the signer were to die.
  • State in the Personal Guaranty that the signer’s total liability is equal to the total liability thereunder divided by the number of other owners who sign a Personal Guaranty.  For example, if the entity has four owners who will sign guarantees, state that the signer’s total liability under the Personal Guaranty equals 25% of the total liability.
  • State in the Personal Guaranty that if the Arizona Cardinals with the Superbowl, the Personal Guaranty will terminate.  A knowledgeable landlord should not have a problem with this because the landlord knows there is almost no chance this will ever happen.

Important Fact About Personal Guarantees & Arizona Community Property

Arizona law provides that a Personal Guaranty signed only by one spouse is not effect against the assets of the non-signer spouse.  If the landlord requires that both spouses sign the Personal Guaranty, try telling the landlord that the spouse who is not active in the business refuses to sign a guaranty.

By |2012-08-18T09:03:27-07:00February 13th, 2011|Dispensary Leases, Legal Issues, Questions People Ask, Real Estate Issues|Comments Off on Considerations on Signing a Personal Guaranty of an Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary Lease

Why Your Dispensary Needs to Rent More Space than Needed for its Retail Store

Question:  I know that in 2007 the U.S. Tax Court ruled in the CHAMPS case that Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code prohibits deducting from gross income any business expenses that are paid or incurred in connection with trafficking in marijuana.  Is there a way that my nonprofit entity that operates an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary can deduct any of its expenses from its gross income on the dispensary’s federal income tax return?

Answer:  Yes.  In the CHAMPS case, the IRS conceded that the taxpayer could deduct its cost of goods sold, which included $575,317 paid for marijuana.  The fight in the CHAMPS case was over what business expenses the taxpayer could deduct.  The IRS argued that the taxpayer had only one business – trafficking in marijuana – and therefore none of its business expenses other than its cost of goods sold were deductible.  The taxpayer successfully argued that it operated two businesses – its medical marijuana sales business and its care-giver business.  The Tax Court agreed with the taxpayer and allowed the taxpayer to allocate its expenses to its two separate businesses and deduct expenses attributable to the care-giver business.

If your Arizona medical marijuana dispensary wants to be able to deduct anything from its gross income above and beyond its cost of goods sold, the dispensary must engage in one or more trades or businesses that do not  involve medical marijuana.  Every would-be dispensary should carefully study the CHAMPS case and learn how CHAMPS operated its care-giver business, which was very extensive and real.  The case illustrates that the sale of medical marijuana was in fact a small portion of everything that the dispensary offered to its patients.  Note also that the salaries paid to management and staff were very nominal – $14,914 paid to officers and directors and $44,799 salaries paid to 25 employees of a dispensary that collected just over $1,000,000 in gross revenue.

Example 1:  Dispensary 1 operates a 2,000 square foot retail dispensary in Phoenix where its sole activity is displaying its products and selling products to patients over the counter.  This dispensary’s entire business involves trafficking in marijuana so it cannot deduct any of its expenses from its federal income tax return.

Example 2:  Dispensary 2 operates a 2,000 square foot retail dispensary in Phoenix, but next door to the dispensary it has an additional 2,000 square feet of space where it provides other services and products to the public such as:

  • yoga classes
  • acupuncture
  • massage therapy
  • classroom instruction on the use of medical marijuana and other pain medications
  • classroom instruction on health care related topics
  • library of books, DVDs and other materials about medical marijuana that patients of the dispensary can use for reading on the premises or to check out and view at home.
  • coffee bar with pastries where people can congregate and relax

Dispensary 2 can now:

  1. allocate occupancy expenses to retail and nonretail
  2. allocate payroll expenses to retail and nonretail
  3. apply a transactional factor

Consider this simple allocation of dispensary 2’s expenses:

  1. Since 1/2 of the leased space is not used for the sale of marijuana, fifty percent of the total rent expense is deductible.  This includes ancillary expenses such as security for the premises, utilities, landscaping, common area expenses and maintenance, janitorial service and premises maintenance.
  2. Dispensary 2 can deduct its payroll expenses attributable to personnel who work solely in the non-marijuana side of the business.  For personnel that work in both aspects of the business, the dispensary must have a method for allocating their payroll to the marijuana related services and the non-marijuana related services.

For more on this important topic, see “IRS is in the Early Stages of a War to Kill Medical Marijuana Dispensaries.”

Although I have a masters degree in income tax law from New York University Law School, I am  no longer a practicing tax lawyer.  I recommend that every dispensary hire a good experienced tax CPA or tax lawyer to advise the dispensary on the federal and state income tax issues arising from the operation of a medical marijuana dispensary.

Circular 230 Notice:  Pursuant to recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department regulations, I am required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including websites linked to, is not intended or written to be used, and  may not be used, for the purpose of  (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

By |2014-05-21T19:42:45-07:00February 12th, 2011|Dispensary Leases, Real Estate Issues, Tax Issues|Comments Off on Why Your Dispensary Needs to Rent More Space than Needed for its Retail Store

Will Humble Explains the Purpose of the Public Hearings on the DHS Rules

From Will Humble’s blog on February 11, 2011:

We’ll be holding four public comment meetings for the Medical Marijuana Rules next week.  Public comment meetings are the part of the Rulemaking process whereby “an agency shall afford persons the opportunity to submit in writing statements, arguments, data and views on the proposed rule, with or without the opportunity to present them orally”.  We technically aren’t required to conduct these meetings because the Medical Marijuana Rulemaking is exempt from the normal process- but we’re doing it anyway because we think it’s a good practice that sometimes helps us make better decisions.

The objective is to listen to comments, concerns, and suggestions for improvements or solutions related to our draft rules. Public comment meetings don’t use a question and answer format- rather they provide a way for people to make suggestions in person.  We take notes and record the sessions- but we don’t answer questions.  Please note that the meetings next week aren’t intended to answer questions about how to open a dispensary.  Here’s the format:

  • Each meeting will consist of Department staff listening to comments, concerns, and suggestions for improvements or solutions related to the Medical Marijuana Program draft rules.
  • Please limit oral comments to the substance and form of the draft rules. Don’t hesitate to express support or opposition to earlier comments but please try to avoid repetition.
  • An individual may also submit written comments using the Comments Form that will be available at each meeting. There will be a marked container to put Comments Forms in at any time during each meeting or after each meeting concludes.
  • Please submit all written comments by 5:00 pm, on Friday, February 18, 2011. All input will be considered when finalizing the Medical Marijuana Program rules.
By |2011-02-12T09:32:44-07:00February 12th, 2011|Will Humble Speaks|Comments Off on Will Humble Explains the Purpose of the Public Hearings on the DHS Rules

Arizona Medical Marijuana FAQ

Yahoo News:  “In the 2010 fall elections, Arizona passed a law legalizing medical marijuana in the state. Though the new law passed by a slim margin and some residents weren’t pleased by its passing, many considered it a victory and step in the right direction.  Despite the public’s opinion, though, police officers throughout Arizona must study up on the new medical marijuana laws in order to best regulate the substance. Here’s everything you need to know regarding Proposition 203’s medical marijuana law in the state of Arizona.”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:18-07:00February 12th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Medical Marijuana FAQ

Medical Marijuana Ordinance Passes in Sedona, Arizona

Yahoo News:  “This northern Arizona city, known for its beautiful scenery and metaphysical qualities, has taken a proactive approach to the coming authorization of medical marijuana use and distribution in the state.  On Feb. 8, the Sedona City Council approved a medical marijuana ordinance that will allow medical marijuana dispensaries and the cultivation of marijuana dispensaries within the city limits.”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:18-07:00February 12th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana Ordinance Passes in Sedona, Arizona

Bill Montgomery and Sheila Polk Probed Whether Prop 203 was Constitutional

Phoenix New Times:  “Back in December, medical marijuana foes Bill Montgomery and Sheila Polk, county attorneys for Maricopa and Yavapai, respectively, quietly explored whether or not Proposition 203 could be declared unconstitutional.”  See the letter from Montgomery and Polk to Arizona Department of Health Services Director Will Humble and his response.

By |2011-02-12T06:08:00-07:00February 12th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Bill Montgomery and Sheila Polk Probed Whether Prop 203 was Constitutional

Participate in Our New Message Forum

We added a message forum to this website.  Its purpose is to create an on-going dialogue among people who are interested in obtaining a license to operate a medical marijuana dispensary, prospective medical directors and others who are interested in Arizona’s newest industry.

The forum is new so we need your help to get it going.  We hope that the forum will be a place that people can discuss industry issues, including various aspects of the proposed Arizona Department of Health Services rules.  Please leave one or more messages.  The more people who participate the more we will all learn.  Please take a minute or two to leave a message by clicking on the Message Forum link on the far right of the top menu.  If nobody uses the forum, I’ll kill it.

By |2015-04-06T18:50:18-07:00February 11th, 2011|Miscellaneous|Comments Off on Participate in Our New Message Forum

Advice to Landlords With Premises Zoned for Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

Question:  I own real property that is zoned for an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary or cultivation site.  How can I increase the chances of obtaining a tenant that will actually obtain a dispensary registration certificate and become a long term paying tenant?

Answer:  Easy.  Lease your property to more than one prospective dispensary owner.  Consider the following two scenarios:

Scenario 1:  You lease to prospective dispensary owner number 1.  The prospective tenant includes a clause in the lease that allows the tenant to terminate the lease if the tenant does not obtain a dispensary license.  The tenant does not obtain a license.  Long term rental income = $0.

Scenario 2:  You lease the same site to 20 prospective dispensary owners.  Each prospective tenant includes a clause in the lease that allows the tenant to terminate the lease if the tenant does not obtain a dispensary license.  One of the 20 prospective tenants obtains a license to operate an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary.  Nineteen prospective tenants leases are canceled.  Long term rental income = big $$.  Of course, each lease should have appropriate language in the lease that notifies each prospective tenant that its lease only becomes effective if the tenant actually obtains the dispensary registration certificate.

Update:  A visitor to this website sent me the following message:

“I thought of this a couple of weeks ago and checked with the AZ Department of Health Services. The first person I spoke with was an employee of the department. She told me that multiple license applications with the same address would all be rejected. I then spoke with Laura Oxley the head of the department. She said it was a good idea, but I should speak with Tom Salow the department  attorney for medical marijuana. Tom said that what I was proposing was currently acceptable under the guidelines, but he expected the guidelines to change making it unacceptable in the next revision.”

If Tom Salow’s statement about is true, why would the Arizona Department of Health Services reject multiple applications for the same location?  It would not make any sense.  The only purpose behind such a rule would be to make it more difficult for prospective dispensaries to find a suitably zoned location and to cause a lot of landlords to waste time entering into leases with tenants that will never get a dispensary registration certificate.  If DHS changes the rules to reject applications for the same location, it would be another instance of the Arizona Department of Health Services bureaucrats/desk jockeys being the problem, not part of the solution.

By |2012-08-18T09:11:36-07:00February 11th, 2011|Dispensary Leases, Legal Issues, Questions People Ask, Real Estate Issues|Comments Off on Advice to Landlords With Premises Zoned for Medical Marijuana Dispensaries

Chandler City Council Passes Tough Medical Marijuana Zoning

Arizona Republic:  “A divided Chandler City Council approved medical marijuana zoning regulations that are among the Valley’s most restrictive and leave few locations for potential dispensaries. . . . So many commercial areas are close to subdivisions that this reduces potential Chandler dispensary locations to a handful of sites along Interstate 10, Price Road and the Santan Freeway.”

By |2012-08-18T09:28:53-07:00February 11th, 2011|Zoning|Comments Off on Chandler City Council Passes Tough Medical Marijuana Zoning

Glendale Works on Medical-marijuana Ordinance

Arizona Republic:  “A Glendale City Council majority this week pushed to extend hours for merchants to sell cannabis beyond what staff proposed. However, council wants to limit the size of cultivation facilities for growers.  Glendale is trying to enact a zoning ordinance before March 1.”

By |2012-08-18T09:37:27-07:00February 11th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Glendale Works on Medical-marijuana Ordinance

Florence Prepares for Arrival of Prescription Pot

Blade Tribune:  “Preparing for the arrival of legal medical marijuana, the Town Council [of Florence] held public hearings and heard the first readings of three measures to provide local control for where dispensaries may locate and how they may operate at Monday’s regular meeting.  The council might not vote until March 21”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:18-07:00February 11th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Florence Prepares for Arrival of Prescription Pot

Medical Marijuana from the Patient’s Perspective

azfamily.com:  “One of the many people keeping a close eye on what the Arizona Department of Health Services will do in developing medical marijuana’s rules is Eric Franks.  Franks, 27, was diagnosed at birth with cerebral palsy and has been battling muscle spasms his whole life.”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:18-07:00February 11th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Video|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana from the Patient’s Perspective

In-depth look at Medical Marijuana in Arizona

azfamily.com:  “Cannabis, weed, reefer, marijuana, however you refer to it, it is now legal medicine in Arizona. By a 5,000-vote margin, Arizona voters said yes to medical marijuana, but the battle over legalization doesn’t end there.  As the state starts to write the rules, everyone seems to have an opinion. From law enforcement, to those who are ill, to the people writing the rules and those who support it, every side has a hand in how Arizona will implement the medical marijuana law.”

In the video, Will Humble says:

  • Our primary goal is to make sure this ends up as a medical use, not recreational use like what has happened in other states.
  • DHS is beging distracted by this medical marijuana law
  • Concerned about leakage from care givers to the street
  • Loop holes with caregivers and grow your own create the risk of recreational use
By |2015-04-06T18:50:17-07:00February 10th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Video, Will Humble Speaks|Comments Off on In-depth look at Medical Marijuana in Arizona

Arizona Police Study Medical Marijuana Law

Arizona Republic:  “Arpaio already building special unit to target those who abuse statute.  The plants that will ultimately produce medical marijuana in Arizona are not legally in the ground, but police agencies are already planning how their officers will try to enforce state pot laws while respecting a sick resident’s right to possess the herb.”

See “Arpaio on lookout for abusers of Arizona medical marijuana law” and “MCSO Sheriff creates Special Enforcement Unit to combat medical marijuana fraud.”

By |2017-02-11T17:31:43-07:00February 10th, 2011|Marijuana Crimes, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Police Study Medical Marijuana Law

Pinal May Allow Pot Dispensaries in Strip Malls

Arizona Republic:  “Pinal County supervisors are expected to vote later this month on a medical marijuana ordinance that would allow dispensaries to operate in strip malls.  A draft plan discussed Wednesday by county supervisors would put medicinal pot outlets in the same zoning category as general business, amusement or recreational enterprises.”

By |2012-08-18T10:04:19-07:00February 9th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Zoning|Comments Off on Pinal May Allow Pot Dispensaries in Strip Malls

Will any Arizona Doctor Agree to be the Medical Director of an Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary?

The Arizona Department of Health Services’ January 31, 2011, second draft of the rules require that every Arizona medical marijuana dispensary have a medical director on the premises or on call.  Proposition 203 contains no such requirement.  Why DHS put the medical director requirement in the rules is beyond me.  I do not understand the purpose of the medical director unless it is to increase the cost of the products sold by the dispensary.  Most doctors are not willing to act as a medical director for a pot clinic and of those that are, not many are willing to do so for free.

I wonder if any doctor will actually take the position as medical director of an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary.  The big unknown at this time is whether a doctor who is the medical director of a dispensary can purchase malpractice insurance and products liability insurance.  I’m guessing that medical malpractice insurance would not cover the doctor because the doctor’s activities as a medical director do not involve the practice of medicine.  The medical director does not see patients.  The rules state,”A medical director shall not establish a physician-patient relationship with . . . a qualifying patient.”  If the medical director cannot purchase appropriate insurance, why would any doctor be the medical director of an Arizona medical marijuana dispensary?

We all know that litigators love to sue anybody within 100 miles of an incident.  Consider what might happen if a patient were to buy a THC laced brownie that caused permanent bodily harm or that killed the patient.  Who do you think will be sued?  I submit that the defendants in the lawsuit will be the dispensary, the medical director, the infusion company that made the brownie, the cook who actually cooked the brownie and possibly the officers and directors who failed to adopt an product inspection system that would have detected the harmful brownie.  The plaintiff may sue the medical director for medical malpractice and for products liability.  Can the medical director purchase malpractice insurance and products liability insurance?

I am not a litigator.  I don’t sue people.  Maybe I am completely off base.  If I am wrong, please let me know.  I’d love to publish an article from somebody in the know that can explain the potential liability of the medical director and what types of insurance the medical director will need and if it is possible for the medical director and/or the dispensary to purchase the insurance.

Suggestion to Arizona Department of Health Services:  You have a medical director.  If you think dispensaries should have a medical director why not require your medical director to be the medical director of all dispensaries and charge each dispensary $500 a month?  Your medical director can then prepare the literature and patient brochures the medical director thinks is appropriate and DHS can sell them to the dispensaries for distribution to patients.

See Will Humble’s unconvincing and nonsensical blog post on why a medical director is necessary and my comments about his reasoning.

An Arizona Physician’s Comments to the Above Article

I was intrigued by your recent post. I am not a attorney, but as a physician with my own medical-legal consulting firm, I do not see much risk of a dispensary’s medical director being sued for medical malpractice. The primary reason for this is that there is no physician-patient relationship – not even contact – between a dispensary customer and the medical director, so by definition, there can be no medical malpractice. (more…)

By |2011-02-11T18:37:01-07:00February 9th, 2011|Medical Directors, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Will any Arizona Doctor Agree to be the Medical Director of an Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary?

Holland, Michigan, Medical Marijuana Dispensary Raided by Police

WZZM ABC TV 13:  “Allegan county prosecutors will now decide whether to bring criminal charges against the owners of a medical marijuana dispensary in Holland.  Police raided The Mix, a storefront on S. Washington last Thursday, based on what they believe was evidence that marijuana was being illegally sold.”

By |2019-06-14T08:24:52-07:00February 9th, 2011|Marijuana Crimes|Comments Off on Holland, Michigan, Medical Marijuana Dispensary Raided by Police

HB 2557 to be Amended to Tax Medical Marijuana 100%

I heard a news report on the radio yesterday that quoted Arizona state legislator Steve Farley as saying that HB 2557 will be modified to tax sales of medical marijuana a a mere 100%.  Whoopee!  See Ray Stern’s story called “Medical Marijuana Tax Proponent Aims Lower; State Rep. Steve Farley Now Wants 100 Percent Tax, Not 300 Percent.”

The following is the text of a February 7, 2011, report from the House Ways & Means committee about HB 2557.  The Bill is now sponsored by only three legislators – Farley, Ash, Chabin:

Overview

HB 2557 creates a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary transaction privilege tax classification and imposes a transaction privilege tax (TPT) and a use tax on dispensaries.

History

Approved by the voters at the November 2, 2010 general election, Proposition 203, known as the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, allows qualifying patients with debilitating medical conditions to obtain certain amounts of marijuana from nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries.

TPT is Arizona’s version of sales tax. Under this tax, the seller is responsible for remitting to the state the entire amount of tax due based on the gross proceeds or gross income of the business. While the tax is commonly passed on to the consumer at the point of sale, it is ultimately the seller’s responsibility to remit the tax. Currently, there are 16 different transaction privilege tax classifications that are mostly taxed at a rate of 6.6 percent (except the mining classification) of their respective tax bases.

Use tax is paid by persons who use, store or consume any tangible personal property upon which tax has not been collected by a retailer. Scenarios in which use tax is collected include out-of-state retailers or utility businesses making sales to Arizona purchasers, Arizona purchasers buying goods using a resale certificate where the goods are used, stored or consumed in Arizona contrary to the purpose stated on the certificate, or where a purchase is made in another state and the sales tax or excise tax imposed is less than the Arizona use tax rate.

fiscal impact

A fiscal note prepared in 2010 by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee for SB 1222 (medical marijuana; transaction privilege tax) estimated that annual reported medical marijuana sales in Arizona would be $25,500,000.

Provisions

  • Establishes a transaction privilege tax classification for nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries, comprised of the business of selling or dispensing medical marijuana to qualified patients.
  • States that the tax base for the nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary classification is the gross proceeds or gross income derived from the business.
  • Sets the tax rate for the tax base at 300 percent.
  • Stipulates that anyone engaged in business as a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary who sells other tangible personal property at retail must separately account for those sales.
  • Specifies that if separate records of sales of other tangible personal property are not kept, the tax shall apply to the person’s entire gross proceeds or gross income from the business.
  • Excludes the tax revenues collected under the nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary classification from being designated for the statutory distribution base of TPT revenues (A.R.S. § 42-5029).
  • Exempts medical marijuana dispensed by a registered nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary from the TPT imposed under the retail transaction privilege classification.
  • Levies an excise (use) tax on the storage, use or consumption of tangible personal property purchased from a nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary at a tax rate of 300 percent of the sales price.
  • Specifies that for manufactured buildings used in the state but purchased outside Arizona, the tax rate is a percentage of 65 percent of the sales price.
  • Makes technical and conforming changes.

Watch the video of the portion of the February 8, 2011, Ways & Means committee hearing dealing with HB 2557.  Click on the last link on the bottom left.

By |2011-02-10T07:42:30-07:00February 9th, 2011|AZ Legislation, Tax Issues|Comments Off on HB 2557 to be Amended to Tax Medical Marijuana 100%

Insuring Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary Business Buildings for Property and Liability

Developing your business plan in anticipation of filing an application with Arizona Department of Health Services ? If so, you’re likely scrambling to find the perfect location(s) for your new Arizona medical marijuana business.  Whether you’re seeking a storefront or a warehouse, there are three things about insuring building(s) for dispensaries, grows or other medical marijuana business uses you should know going in:

  • “Admitted carriers” such as Progressive or Farmers will not insure medical marijuana businesses – period. They have made a business decision to not serve specialty markets.
  • A few other carriers might insure your leased or owned buildings, depending upon the specific circumstances. They are willing to take on more risk, but the medical marijuana industry is not their specialty.
  • Comprehensive coverage for your medical marijuana business, written with A-rated carriers, IS available from agents and insurers who have made a commitment to the medical marijuana industry.

Let’s keep these few facts in mind as we discuss the best way to protect yourself and your future business through the uncertainties of the current pre-DHS application period.

Getting Into the Building

Many landlords require proof of property and liability insurance before giving their new tenants access to the building. This is prudent, and generally required under the terms of the building owner’s “lessor’s risk” policy.

Your future landlord needs to know that claims against that policy resulting from MEDICAL MARIJUANA business activities aren’t likely to pay out, however, as suggested in the first bullet point. While it’s their responsibility to discuss any tenant changes with their agent, I always advise my clients to bring the topic up so that everyone is on the same page, helping all parties to avoid any nasty surprises later.

Insuring Appropriately Now While Planning for Later

While waiting to find out if you’ll receive a dispensary license from DHS, you need only insure yourself against liability, any damage to your newly leased property and loss or damage to property you may have in the building. Simply put, basic coverage is sufficient for this stage.

Many carriers will write a policy for empty office or warehouse space, but offer only a one year term – and given that it will be just a few months before you receive your dispensary license (or not) this doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, especially as they will charge you a short-rate penalty for cancelling before the end of the term.

A better approach is to obtain your basic policy now from a carrier that won’t penalize you later, when you’re ready to begin insuring your new MEDICAL MARIJUANA operation with industry-specific coverage. You can either get a basic six-month policy that can be “flipped” to another carrier (under the same parent company) to one that specifically includes coverage for MEDICAL MARIJUANA businesses, or get a pared down policy from a company specializing in MEDICAL MARIJUANA policies and simply add additional coverage as needed. Either approach will help you to avoid unnecessary penalties or fees while ensuring that your new venture is appropriately covered.

Such flexibility in coverage costs a bit more, but provides several significant benefits – no risk of denied claims due to undeclared MEDICAL MARIJUANA operations, eliminating the danger of coverage gaps or lapses, and simplying the whole insurance process – all far outweigh the small additional costs.

The majority of carriers serve the majority of the market. If your business is out of the ordinary, however, your insurance needs likely are as well. Specialty brokers meet those needs.

Doug Banfelder is a Commercial Insurance Specialist.  Reach him to insure your Arizona medical marijuana dispensary at 480-315-9051 or www.PremierDispensaryInsurance.com

By |2011-10-02T18:14:18-07:00February 9th, 2011|Dispensary Insurance, Dispensary Leases, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Insuring Arizona Medical Marijuana Dispensary Business Buildings for Property and Liability

Medical Marijuana Unversity Opening in Arizona!

Funkmaster Flex:  “The first and only state-approved medical marijuana institution for higher education is coming to Arizona. Gus Escamilla, CEO and founder of Greenway University, has already established a campus in Denver and plans to open a second one in Phoenix.”

By |2011-02-09T07:20:36-07:00February 9th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana Unversity Opening in Arizona!

Marijuana Use & Earlier Onset of Psychosis?

Will Humble’s blog:  “A number of published studies have found that using marijuana (and other psychoactive substances) is associated with an earlier onset of psychotic illness (notice I said “is associated with” rather than “causes”).  National mental health surveys have repeatedly found more substance use, especially cannabis use, among people with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.

The blog post contains this very strange statement:

“it makes sense to have some professional medical oversight at dispensaries to help protect the health status of the patients with debilitating medical conditions that will be using the dispensaries.”

Has Will Humble read his own rules?  The medical director is a figurehead with no real involvement with the dispensary or its patients.  The medical director who will rarely be present in a dispensary is not hired to provide professional medical oversight for dispensaries.  How can a doctor who will not see, examine, communicate with or have anything to do with a dispensary’s patients possibly “protect the health status of the patients?”

Under the  Arizona Department of Health Services rules, the duties of the medical director are almost exclusively to provide pamphlets, brochures and informational materials for use by the dispensary and/or distribution to patients.  The medical director is more like the librarian of a medical library that recommends reading materials related to medical marijuana.

By |2011-02-10T07:17:20-07:00February 8th, 2011|Medical Directors, Will Humble Speaks|Comments Off on Marijuana Use & Earlier Onset of Psychosis?

Chandler Police Find Large Pot Growing Operation

Arizona Republic:  “What started out as a routine traffic stop Sunday night led patrol officers to seize 332 potted marijuana plants worth up to $1 million, making it the largest marijuana grow operation bust in Chandler history

By |2011-02-08T20:38:28-07:00February 8th, 2011|Marijuana Crimes, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Chandler Police Find Large Pot Growing Operation

Medical Marijuana Cultivation Plan Antagonizes Feds in Oakland — and Arizona’s Plan is Similar

Ray Stern, Phoenix New Times:  “A plan to oversee medical marijuana cultivation centers in Oakland drew fire from the feds last week — yet the plan is similar to that being developed in Arizona.  The way we read it, the February 1 letter from Melinda Haag, U.S. Attorney for California’s Northern District, (see below), to the city of Oakland could signal possible problems for Arizona’s medical pot program,”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:17-07:00February 8th, 2011|California News, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Medical Marijuana Cultivation Plan Antagonizes Feds in Oakland — and Arizona’s Plan is Similar

AZDHS Proposes Using CHAA Map To Designate Marijuana Dispensaries

Medical Marijuana Growers Association:  “Director Will Humble stated that he looks to use the CHAA map as a guideline for dispensary placement, but in doing so he is limiting caregivers and patients from cultivating medical marijuana for themselves, which, in turn, will limit the amount of medication that can be donated to a dispensary.”

By |2015-04-06T18:50:17-07:00February 8th, 2011|Real Estate Issues, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on AZDHS Proposes Using CHAA Map To Designate Marijuana Dispensaries

1,055 Visitors Yesterday – a New Daily Record

Thanks again to all who visit this site.  Yesterday 1,055 visitors came to this site, which is a new daily record.  The week ending Sunday, February 6, 2011, set a weekly record with 3,576 visitors.

By |2011-02-08T05:37:00-07:00February 8th, 2011|Miscellaneous|Comments Off on 1,055 Visitors Yesterday – a New Daily Record

Surprise Councilman Wants Pot Dispensaries Out of Industrial Areas

KSAZ Fox 10:  “Now that medical marijuana is legal in the state of Arizona, cities are trying to figure out the rules about where marijuana dispensaries can be located. One city [Surprise] has plans to restrict them to industrial areas, but some say that’s unfair to the patients who need it.”

City Councilman Wants Pot Dispensaries Out of Industrial Areas: MyFoxPHOENIX.com

By |2015-04-06T18:50:17-07:00February 6th, 2011|Stories & Articles, Video, Zoning|Comments Off on Surprise Councilman Wants Pot Dispensaries Out of Industrial Areas

Will Humble & Andrew Myers on KJZZ Radio

Listen to the audio of Steve Goldstein’s February 4, 2011,  interview of Will Humble and Andrew Myers on NPR, KJZZ (91.5 FM) radio.  Here is my summary of the interview.  Will Humble said:

  • Arizona Department of Health Services has three goals in drafting the rules.

1.  Disperse dispensaries so areas with fewer people will have better access to a dispensary

2.  Spread dispensaries throughout the state so as to minimize the ability of people to grow because they do not live within 25 miles of a dispensary

3.  Prevent the clustering of dispensaries in the urban core

  • Dispersing dispensaries throughout Arizona using the Community Health Analysis Area (CHAA) is the “perfect system”to accomplish these three objectives.
  • He doesn’t want to “overburden” communities with the clustering of a lot of dispensaries in one area because it creates problems.
  • DHS’ primary objective is to keep marijuana use for medicinal purposes rather than recreational use, which is what happened in several other states that legalized medical marijuana.  Twelve doctors in Colorado wrote 75 percent of recommendations.
  • DHS will go after doctors who primarily write for recreational users rather than for medicinal purposes.
  • No clue as to how many applications for dispensaries will be filed.
  • Ajo is in a desirable CHAA because it is an inexpensive place to grow even though the its CHAA a has small population.
  • Cities that adopted zoning before January 31, 2011, need to look at CHAA map and revisit their zoning to take the CHAAs into consideration.

Here’s my take on what Will Humble’s want-a-be-aid Andrew Myers said in the joint interview:

  • He loves the second draft of the rules.  Will Humble is awesome.
  • He is concerned about the selection process.  Myers wants dispensaries to picked by a “qualitative approach” instead of a lottery, but it could cause litigation.  AzMMA will propose a qualitative picking method.
  • When asked if he is concerned that the lottery process could result in the wrong people getting involved?  Myers said the selection process is very important.  A lottery encourages people to submit many applications.

At this point Will Humble added that the lottery selection method is his pragmatic choice.  ADHS’  budget was cut 43% over the last three years.  He doesn’t want ADHS  to be in a dispute resolution phase with people who think their application is better than another applicant that won a license.  ADHS doesn’t have the resources to examine every application and issue licenses based on quality of the applicant.

The interviewer asked the two men he was interviewing if there is any truth to allegations that Andrew Myers and the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association are in cahoots with Will Humble and ADHS.  Will said he learned that if you don’t have anything nice to say then don’t say it.  Andrew then said the allegation is ridiculous.  For more on this topic see “Arizona Association of Dispensary Professionals Declares War on Arizona Department of Health Services, Marijuana Policy Project & the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association.”

To learn more about the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association, read “What is the Arizona Medical Marijuana Association?

By |2011-02-06T09:44:24-07:00February 6th, 2011|Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Will Humble & Andrew Myers on KJZZ Radio

Arizona Medical Marijuana Zoning Laws

azmarijuana.com:  “My staff has compiled as much Medical Marijuana zoning information that they could get their hands on.”

By |2011-02-26T09:30:56-07:00February 6th, 2011|Zoning|1 Comment

View the CHAA Map to Locate Addresses Within CHAAs & Information about CHAAs

Arizona Department of Health Services rules divide Arizona into 126 areas called Community Health Analysis Areas (CHAA).  The rules limit the number of Arizona medical marijuana dispensaries in a CHAA to ONE!  The goal of ADHS Director Will Humble is to disperse the 125 dispensaries throughout Arizona to minimize the number of patients who will be able to grow their own marijuana because the patient does not live within 25 miles of a dispensary.

To view the CHAAs go to the Medical Marijuana Dispensary CHAA Map.  You can zoom in and out or enter an address to determine the CHAA in which the address is located.   If you click on a CHAA, the map will display the name of the CHAA, its ID number, 2000 population and 2010 population.

By |2011-02-11T19:20:27-07:00February 6th, 2011|CHAAs, Real Estate Issues|Comments Off on View the CHAA Map to Locate Addresses Within CHAAs & Information about CHAAs

Arizona Law may Allow Marijuana in Some Parks

Arizona Republic:  “A loophole in the state’s new medical-marijuana law could open thousands of neighborhood parks, playgrounds, greenbelts and artificial lakes to resident joint smokers, legal experts [the reporter quotes non-lawyer Alan Sobol] say.  The law approved by Arizona voters in November prohibits marijuana smoking “in any public place,” but properties controlled by homeowners associations are considered private property.”

My opinion is this story is much ado about nothing written by a reporter who does not understand the difference between a “public place” and “private property.”  Yes, homeowners associations’ common areas are on private property, but that does not mean that the common areas are not public places.  Certainly the common areas are used by a restricted segment of the population, but nevertheless, the common areas are public places as to the members of the association and their invitees.  An Arizona court could rule in the future that common areas of an HOA are not public places for the purposes of Arizona’s medical marijuana law, but I doubt a court would come to that conclusion.

See “Medical Marijuana in Community Associations – A Smoking Hot Issue.”

By |2011-02-11T19:20:36-07:00February 6th, 2011|Real Estate Issues, Stories & Articles|Comments Off on Arizona Law may Allow Marijuana in Some Parks
Go to Top